[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090924155604.4299aa0a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:56:04 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: iceberg <strakh@...ras.ru>
Cc: James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, eric@...ante.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: sleeping function called from invalid
context
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:58:47 +0000
iceberg <strakh@...ras.ru> wrote:
> Driver scsi_lib.c might sleep in atomic context, because it calls
> scsi_device_put under spin_lock_irqsave.
> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:356:
> spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
> scsi_device_put(sdev);
> Path to might_sleep macro from scsi_device_put:
> 1. scsi_device_put calls put_device at ./drivers/scsi/scsi.c:1111
> 2. put_device calls kobject_put at ./drivers/base/core.c:1038
> 3. kobject_put calls kref_put at ./lib/kobject.c
> 4. kref_put may call callback function kobject_release at ./lib/kref.c if
> refcount becomes zero, which might_sleep because it calls user event. Details:
> 4.1 kobject_cleanup calls kobject_uevent at ./lib/kobject.c:555
> 4.2 kobject_uevent calls kobject_uevent_env at ./lib/kobject_uevent.c:282
> 4.3 kobject_uevent_env calls call_usermodehelper_exec at
> ./include/linux/kmod.h:83
> 4.4 call_usermodehelper_exec calls wait_for_completion at
> ./kernel/kmod.c:481
> 4.5 wait_for_completion calls wait_for_common at ./kernel/sched.c:5710
> 4.5 wait_for_common calls might_sleep at ./kernels/sched.c:5692
>
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project.
>
> Delete wrong sleeping function calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Strakh <strakh@...ras.ru>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/./a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/./b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index f3c4089..a8f8e2f 100644
> --- a/./a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/./b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -353,9 +353,9 @@ static void scsi_single_lun_run(struct scsi_device
> *current_sdev)
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
> blk_run_queue(sdev->request_queue);
> - spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
>
> - scsi_device_put(sdev);
> + scsi_device_put(sdev);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
> }
> out:
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
>
Well this is strange. afacit all the code to which you refer is
ancient, so why did this bug just pop up now?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists