[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090925073617.GA5856@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:36:17 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stanislav Brabec <utx@...guin.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...e.de, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial-core: resume serial hardware with
no_console_suspend
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 05:05:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:38:58 +0200
> Stanislav Brabec <utx@...guin.cz> wrote:
>
> > Hardware may need re-initialization to get serial port working after
> > resume. It does not happen with no_console_suspend. Attached patch
> > attempts to fix it.
> >
> > The patch attempts to keep hardware running before suspend and run
> > hardware re-initialization after resume. Maybe simpler approach is
> > possible.
>
> The patch doesn't apply any more and seems like a rather hacky thing to do.
>
> It appears that you have specific serial hardware which doesn't resume
> correctly? If so, that's a bug, so how about we start with a bug
> report/description?
It's something that I did point out when the no_console_suspend patch
appeared, but I was overruled/ignored.
The problem is that on ARM hardware, there is no BIOS to re-initialize
hardware. The kernel has to do restore the entire system hardware
state upon resume. Unfortunately, no_console_suspend not only prevents
the console from being suspended but _also_ resumed.
The result of that is the console UART is left in a totally uninitialized
state.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists