linux-kernel - Re: ARCH=x86 patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1253872246.4310.1448.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Date:	Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:50:46 -0700
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ARCH=x86 patch

On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 02:37 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> I am confused, because I could have sworn I had tested this combination 
> already, but having applied Jeff's UM fix and then David's ARCH=x86 
> patch on top of that, I now find that all the 32-bit builds crap out 
> when building on a 64-bit platform, due to asm-offsets.c being compiled 
> with -m64 rather than -m32.

Argh.

All this nonsense simply because Ingo objected to my previous patch...
purely on the basis that it made 'make randconfig' actually random.

-- 
dwmw2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/