linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] vfs: new O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:02:22 -0600
From:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
To:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc:	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: new O_NODE open flag

On Sep 25, 2009  13:20 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:37:47 BST, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" said:
> 
> > Given an fd opened in this way is it possible to reopen it normally and
> > be guarenteed to get the same object?
> 
> It's not possible even without this flag. Consider:
> 
>         fd1 = open("/tmp/foo",flags);
>         rc = rename("/tmp/foo","/tmp/bar");
>         fd2 = open("/tmp/foo",flags);
> 
> Or were you asking if *absent that sort of tomfoolery* if it would work?

No, the point is that we HAVE an fd that points to the original "/tmp/foo"
opened with O_NODE, and now (after an ioctl, stat, etc) we decide it is
safe to open the file read and/or write without releasing the existing
fd.  The whole point is to AVOID this kind of tomfoolery.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/