linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf_counter: cleanup for __perf_event_sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ABC1B55.3020108@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:22:29 +0800
From:	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf_counter: cleanup for __perf_event_sched_*()



Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> 
> Hrm.. I think its not just a cleanup, but an actual bugfix.
> 
> The intent was to call event_sched_{in,out}() for single counter groups
> because that's cheaper than group_sched_{in,out}(), however..
> 
>  - as you noticed, I got the condition wrong, it should have read:
> 
>      list_empty(&event->sibling_list)
> 
>  - it failed to call group_can_go_on() which deals with ->exclusive.
> 
>  - it also doesn't call hw_perf_group_sched_in() which might break
>    power.
> 

Yeah, I'll fix the title

> Also, I'm not sure I like the comments and WARN_ON bits, the changelog
> should be sufficient.
> 

Um, I'll remove the comments and WARN_ON_ONCE()

Thanks,
Xiao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/