linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] perf_core: provide a kernel-internal interface to get to performance counters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:48:48 +0200
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] perf_core: provide a kernel-internal interface to
 get to performance counters

On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:02:46 +0530
"K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 12:03:28PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:

> > For what it's worth, this sort of thing also looks useful from
> > systemtap's point of view.
> 
> Wouldn't SystemTap be another user that desires support for
> multiple/all CPU perf-counters (apart from hw-breakpoints as a
> potential user)? As Arjan pointed out, perf's present design would
> support only a per-CPU or per-task counter; not both.

I'm sorry but I think I am missing your point.
"all cpu counters" would be one small helper wrapper away, a helper I'm
sure the SystemTap people are happy to submit as part of their patch
series when they submit SystemTap to the kernel.


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/