lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:50:49 +0200
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] Simplify bound checks in nvram for copy_from_user


From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] Simplify bound checks in nvram for copy_from_user

The nvram driver's write() function has an interesting bound check.
Not only does it use the always-hard-to-read ? C operator, it also
has a magic "i" in there, which comes from the file position of
the file.

On first sight the check looks sane, however the value of "i" is not 
checked at all and I as human don't know if the C type rules guarantee
that the result is always within bounds.. and neither does gcc seem to
know.

This patch simplifies the checks and guarantees that the copy will not
overflow the destination buffer.

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>


diff --git a/drivers/char/nvram.c b/drivers/char/nvram.c
index 88cee40..b2a7eaf 100644
--- a/drivers/char/nvram.c
+++ b/drivers/char/nvram.c
@@ -267,7 +267,15 @@ static ssize_t nvram_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 	unsigned char *tmp;
 	int len;
 
-	len = (NVRAM_BYTES - i) < count ? (NVRAM_BYTES - i) : count;
+	len = count;
+	if (count > NVRAM_BYTES - i)
+		len = NVRAM_BYTES - i;
+
+	if (len > NVRAM_BYTES)
+		len = NVRAM_BYTES;
+	if (len < 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	if (copy_from_user(contents, buf, len))
 		return -EFAULT;
 


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists