linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] HWPOISON: remove the unsafe __set_page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 26 Sep 2009 05:49:36 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] HWPOISON: remove the unsafe __set_page_locked()

On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 11:15:37AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> The swap cache and page cache code assume that they 'own' the newly
> allocated page and therefore can disregard the locking rules. However
> now hwpoison can hit any time on any page.
> 
> So use the safer lock_page()/trylock_page(). The main intention is not
> to close such a small time window of memory corruption. But to avoid
> kernel oops that may result from such races, and also avoid raising
> false alerts in hwpoison stress tests.
> 
> This in theory will slightly increase page cache/swap cache overheads,
> however it seems to be too small to be measurable in benchmark.

Thanks. Can you please describe what benchmarks you used?

Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
-andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/