[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090926145606.GA30071@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:56:06 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oren Laadan <orenl@...rato.com>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, xemul@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/80] Kernel based checkpoint/restart [v18]
* Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com> wrote:
> >> Q: What additional work needs to be done to it? A: Fill in the
> >> gory details following the examples so far. Current WIP includes
> >> inet sockets, event-poll, and early work on inotify, mount
> >> namespace and mount-points, pseudo file systems
>
> AM> Will this new code muck up the kernel, or will it be clean?
>
> I have (and have previously posted) prototype code to do c/r of open
> sockets, ignoring some things like updating timers and such. It looks
> rather similar to the existing UNIX bits, and is even easier in some
> ways.
>
> One particular use case is only migrating listening sockets and
> allowing the connected ones to be reset upon restart. That enables a
> bunch of things like apache, postfix, vncserver, and even sshd. I
> will pull the listen-only bits out of my current patch, scrape off a
> little bitrot, and post them in a few days.
That looks useful. (Btw., the other four questions Andrew asked look
relevant too.)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists