[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ABFB524.5030008@cesarb.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:55:32 -0300
From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@...arb.net>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] WARN_ONCE(): use bool for condition
Daniel Walker escreveu:
> On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 15:25 -0300, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
>> - int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition); \
>> + bool __ret_warn_on = (condition); \
>
> Did you try it without removing the "!!" ? In my original email I tested
> the path of least resistance, and I left the "!!" in there..
Just tried, same result (it seems gcc can easily see past the double
negation).
--
Cesar Eduardo Barros
cesarb@...arb.net
cesar.barros@...il.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists