[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090927225220.GB19076@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:52:20 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug] /etc/profile: line 30: /dev/null: Permission denied
(Was: Re: [PATCH] Remove broken by design and by implementation
devtmpfs maintenance disaster)
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:49:26PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > > I've reproduced a bug with the following .config options:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ??CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y
> > > > > > ??CONFIG_DEVTMPFS_MOUNT=y
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /dev/null and /dev/zero are not read/writable to ordinary users,
> > > > > > breaking normal bootup and login:
> > > > >
> > > > > Udev should run long before some ordinary/non-root user can login,
> > > > > and apply the permissions as it always does. It's known to work on
> > > > > Fedora, SUSE, Ubuntu. What kind of system/environment/setup is that
> > > > > where you see this?
> > > >
> > > > I don't know if this is what Ingo does, but I have a few machines
> > > > where I don't run the distro-supplied 'initrd' at all, because it's
> > > > easier to boot without it. The Fedora initrd doesn't allow me to
> > > > sanely set root filesystem parameters without totally rewriting the
> > > > initrd image, which I'm not interested in, for example (they'll take
> > > > effect for the root initrd, not the final root).
> > >
> > > Correct: i'm booting raw bzImages, with /dev copied to the real /dev. To
> > > this box udev is mostly an annoyance that slows down my bootup ;-)
> >
> > I use non-initrd systems as well, and this option works for me on Gentoo
> > and SUSE machines.
> >
> > As you are using a very old udev, and the boot infrastructure for udev
> > in older Fedora releases was a bit "odd" in places, I would recommend
> > not using these options on that machine. If we need to reword the
> > Kconfig help option to make it a bit more clear, do you have a
> > suggestion on what we should change?
>
> "no regressions" ?
It's now resolved, so there are no regressions :)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists