| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4ABEF569.1070708@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:17:29 +0800
From: Jia Zhang <jia.zhang2008@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] softlockup: keep current softlockup period before touching
timestamp
Imaging such a scenario, softlockup deadline is 60s and a softirq runs
at most 65s. Assume that currently that softirq runs 50s. At this
moment, issue a "echo 40 > /proc/sys/kernel/softlockup_thresh" and thus
lead to recounting the timeout. The remaining time for that softirq
is 15s less than new threshold 40s, which means the warning will be
depressed after 15s. This is not what we expected because softlockup
actually feeds a 100s(old+new) for that softirq. To fix this problem,
softlockup should keep current softlockup period before touching
timestamp, except for the case of increasing threshold.
Signed-off-by: Jia Zhang <jia.zhang2008@...il.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 5 +----
kernel/softlockup.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
kernel/sysctl.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 848d1f2..6583f6a 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -308,10 +308,7 @@ extern void sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p);
extern void softlockup_tick(void);
extern void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void);
extern void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void);
-extern int proc_dosoftlockup_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
- struct file *filp, void __user *buffer,
- size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos);
-extern unsigned int softlockup_panic;
+extern unsigned int softlockup_panic;
extern int softlockup_thresh;
#else
static inline void softlockup_tick(void)
diff --git a/kernel/softlockup.c b/kernel/softlockup.c
index 88796c3..2ffd34b 100644
--- a/kernel/softlockup.c
+++ b/kernel/softlockup.c
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
* started by Ingo Molnar, Copyright (C) 2005, 2006 Red Hat, Inc.
*
* this code detects soft lockups: incidents in where on a CPU
- * the kernel does not reschedule for 10 seconds or more.
+ * the kernel does not reschedule for at most 60 seconds.
*/
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(print_lock);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, softlockup_thresh);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, touch_timestamp);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, print_timestamp);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, watchdog_task);
@@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ static void __touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
__raw_get_cpu_var(touch_timestamp) = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(softlockup_thresh) = softlockup_thresh;
}
void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
@@ -89,14 +91,6 @@ void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs);
-int proc_dosoftlockup_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
- struct file *filp, void __user *buffer,
- size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
-{
- touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs();
- return proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, filp, buffer, lenp, ppos);
-}
-
/*
* This callback runs from the timer interrupt, and checks
* whether the watchdog thread has hung or not:
@@ -108,9 +102,16 @@ void softlockup_tick(void)
unsigned long print_timestamp;
struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs();
unsigned long now;
+ int new_thresh = softlockup_thresh;
+ int cur_thresh = per_cpu(softlockup_thresh, this_cpu);
+ if (unlikely(new_thresh > cur_thresh)) {
+ cur_thresh = new_thresh;
+ per_cpu(softlockup_thresh, this_cpu) = new_thresh;
+ }
+
/* Is detection switched off? */
- if (!per_cpu(watchdog_task, this_cpu) || softlockup_thresh <= 0) {
+ if (unlikely(!per_cpu(watchdog_task, this_cpu) || cur_thresh <= 0)) {
/* Be sure we don't false trigger if switched back on */
if (touch_timestamp)
per_cpu(touch_timestamp, this_cpu) = 0;
@@ -140,11 +141,11 @@ void softlockup_tick(void)
* Wake up the high-prio watchdog task twice per
* threshold timespan.
*/
- if (now > touch_timestamp + softlockup_thresh/2)
+ if (now > touch_timestamp + cur_thresh/2)
wake_up_process(per_cpu(watchdog_task, this_cpu));
/* Warn about unreasonable delays: */
- if (now <= (touch_timestamp + softlockup_thresh))
+ if (now <= (touch_timestamp + cur_thresh))
return;
per_cpu(print_timestamp, this_cpu) = touch_timestamp;
@@ -215,6 +216,7 @@ cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
printk(KERN_ERR "watchdog for %i failed\n", hotcpu);
return NOTIFY_BAD;
}
+ per_cpu(softlockup_thresh, hotcpu) = softlockup_thresh;
per_cpu(touch_timestamp, hotcpu) = 0;
per_cpu(watchdog_task, hotcpu) = p;
kthread_bind(p, hotcpu);
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
index 7f4f57b..89bfadd 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -876,7 +876,7 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
.data = &softlockup_thresh,
.maxlen = sizeof(int),
.mode = 0644,
- .proc_handler = &proc_dosoftlockup_thresh,
+ .proc_handler = &proc_dointvec_minmax,
.strategy = &sysctl_intvec,
.extra1 = &neg_one,
.extra2 = &sixty,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists