[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ABF2262.3090905@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 01:29:22 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: add show_lapic=
Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [Yinghai Lu - Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:01:52AM -0700]
> |
> | so could use that together with apci=debug to print less cpu apic.
> |
> | otherwise for system have more cpus will take a while
> |
> | also move apic_verbosity check to print_all_ICs
> |
> | Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> |
> | ---
> | arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> | 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> ...
>
> Hi Yinghai, good idea!
>
> I've tuned your patch a bit together with changelog.
>
> 1) show_lapic=1 by default does change current kernel behaviour
> so it should be set to max cpu available.
think about system with lots of cpu. but i still want to use apic=debug
> 2) show_lapic contains the max number of lapics being printed
> so we need to count them instead of plain comparation with
> cpu number, as a result I've changed print_local_APICs. Or
> you meant _exactly_ cpuid number? In meaning like
> show_lapic=max_cpuid. Hmm?
>
your change anything about that. there is not gap between cpu id.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists