linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: fix lock imbalance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ABF257C.2000803@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:42:36 +0200
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
CC:	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: fix lock imbalance

On 09/25/2009 10:33 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Stanse found 2 lock imbalances in kvm_request_irq_source_id and
> kvm_free_irq_source_id. They omit to unlock kvm->irq_lock on fail paths.
>
> Fix that by adding unlock labels at the end of the functions and jump
> there from the fail paths.
>    

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/