linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Remove pty_ops_bsd and pty_bsd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7306.1254149744@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:55:44 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove pty_ops_bsd and pty_bsd_ioctl() as they're not used

Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

> > Possibly legacy_pty_init() should be passing this to tty_set_operations()
> > rather than pty_ops.
> 
> It should indeed, otherwise the BSD pty locking ioctl fails.

In that case, what should be using pty_ops?  If CONFIG_LEGACY_PTYS=n, then I
see:

	drivers/char/pty.c:314: warning: unused variable `pty_ops'

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/