[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090928173819.GA2441@ldl.fc.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:38:20 -0600
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
To: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>
Cc: lenb@...nel.org, bjorn.helgaas@...com, andrew.patterson@...com,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: pci_root: fix NULL pointer deref after resume
from suspend
Hi Xiaotian,
Thanks for the bug report.
* Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>:
> commit 275582 introduces acpi_get_pci_dev(), but pdev->subordinate
> can be NULL, then a NULL was passed to pci_get_slot, this results
> the kernel oops when resume from suspend.
>
> This patch resolves following kernel oops:
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000028
> IP: [<ffffffff812217e7>] pci_get_slot+0x4c/0x8c
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index 3112221..3c35144 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -387,7 +387,11 @@ struct pci_dev *acpi_get_pci_dev(acpi_handle handle)
> if (!pdev || hnd == handle)
> break;
>
> - pbus = pdev->subordinate;
> + if (pdev->subordinate)
> + pbus = pdev->subordinate;
> + else
> + pbus = pdev->bus;
> +
I'm a little confused by this. If we start from the PCI root
bridge and walk back down the hierarchy, shouldn't everything
between the root and the device be a P2P bridge?
What is special about suspend/resume that causes the subordinate
bus to become NULL?
Can you send the full stacktrace?
Thanks.
/ac
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists