linux-kernel - Re: [git pull request] ACPI & driver patches for Linux-2.6.32-rc0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AC134EB.1050705@suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:12:59 +0400
From:	Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>
To:	Thomas Backlund <tmb@...driva.org>
CC:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull request] ACPI & driver patches for Linux-2.6.32-rc0

Thomas Backlund пишет:
> Thomas Backlund wrote:
>> Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>>> Thomas Backlund пишет:
>>>>
>>>> Now this is a Acer TravelMate 5720G laptop with the latest 1.35 bios.
>>>> Distro is Mandriva Linux Cooker, and arch is x86_64
>>>>
>>>> Attached is output of "grep ACPI /var/log/dmesg"
>>>> dmesg-acpi-20090903
>>>> - all acpi patches as of 2.6.32-rc1
>>> This one does not have errors you've mentioned earlier, could you 
>>> find dmesg with them?
>>
>> Ah, sorry about that...
>> I should have done dmesg|grep ACPI to get the errors... it would have 
>> shown this too:
>> tg3 0000:02:00.0: wake-up capability disabled by ACPI
>> ACPI Exception: AE_TIME, Returned by Handler for [EmbeddedControl] 
>> (20090903/evregion-424)
>> ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed 
>> [\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.EC0_.GBST] (Node ffff88013f81c5e0), AE_TIME
>> ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed 
>> [\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.EC0_.BAT0._BST] (Node ffff88013f81c720), AE_TIME
>> ACPI Exception: AE_TIME, Evaluating _BST (20090903/battery-393)
>>
>>
>>
>>>> dmesg-acpi-20090903-ec-2.6.31
>>>> - all acpi patches as of 2.6.32-rc1
>>>> - ec.c from 2.6.31.1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Should I start bisecting, or do you have any other suggestion?
>>> There is only one patch which touch ec.c, 
>>> 2a84cb9852f52c0cd1c48bca41a8792d44ad06cc. You may try to revert it, 
>>> and see.
>>>
>>
>> Isn't that what pretty much what I did when I built a kernel with the 
>> 2.6.31.1 ec.c ?
>>
>> Anyway, after I applied your patch you just posted on acpi-devel:
>> ACPI: EC: Rewrite DMI checks
>>
>> to the 2.6.32-rc1 tree the:
>>
>>> -ACPI Error (psargs-0359): [\_PR_.CPU0.CSTX] Namespace lookup 
>>> failure, AE_NOT_FOUND
>>> -ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed 
>>> [\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.EC0_._Q2F] (Node ffff88013f81c1a0), AE_NOT_FOUND
>>
>> does not show up at boot anymore, and so far I haven't seen the other 
>> errors either...
>>
>> I'll post a follow-up if they show up again...
>>
> 
> Bah...
> I spoke too soon:
> 
Could you please turn on timing information in printk ? 
Please also uncomment "#define DEBUG" in ec.c

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/