linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Userspace RCU: (ab)using futexes to save cpu cycles and energy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AC06187.2050806@lumino.de>
Date:	Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:11:03 +0200
From:	Michael Schnell <mschnell@...ino.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Userspace RCU: (ab)using futexes to save cpu cycles and
 energy

Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> 
> The mutex code (and usual futex users) use futex to implement mutual
> exclusion.  My goal is to send a wakeup signal to a thread waiting for
> work to perform when adding such work. But without any mutual exclusion.

Why is that different ?

if you use a normal FUTEX like pthread_mutex_...() and have the thread
block right at the start (by blocking the *UTEX before creating the
thread). Now you can wake the thread by unblocking the *UTEX.

-Michael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/