linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] scsi: export and clean up headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090929124620.2c8abc4d@infradead.org>
Date:	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:46:20 +0200
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] scsi: export and clean up headers

On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:33:53 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:

> This implements a minor cleanup of exported scsi headers,
> and adds export of headers that are de-facto used by userspace.
> The patches are on top of 2.6.32-rc1.
> Can these be queued for 2.6.32?
> Thanks.
> 

one of the problems I've found is that glibc has its own copy
of scsi headers, causing interesting conflicts. Do you know for
sure that with these cleanups we can retire the glibc headers?
(that would be very welcome)
If not, do you know what it would take to get to that point?


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/