[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AC20BB8.4070509@free.fr>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:29:28 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, mingo@...e.hu,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, xemul@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/80] Kernel based checkpoint/restart [v18]
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Andrew Morton (akpm@...ux-foundation.org):
>
>> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:50:40 -0400
>> Oren Laadan <orenl@...rato.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Q: What about namespaces ?
>>> A: Currrently, UTS and IPC namespaces are restored. They demonstrate
>>> how namespaces are handled. More to come.
>>>
>> Will this new code muck up the kernel?
>>
[ cut ]
> For network namespaces i think it's clearer that a wrapper
> program should set up the network for the restarted init task,
> while the usrspace code should recreate any private network
> namespaces and veth's which were created by the application.
> But it still needs discussion.
>
Ok for the restart, but for the checkpoint, how do you access the
network setup from a process which belongs to another namespace context ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists