[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <12541998232366-git-send-email->
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:50:21 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] rcu: replace the rcu_barrier enum with pointer to call_rcu*() function
The rcu_barrier enum causes several problems: (1) you have to define
the enum somewhere, and there is no convenient place, (2) the difference
between TREE_RCU and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU causes problems when you need to
map from rcu_barrier enum to struct rcu_state, (3) the switch statement
are large, and (4) TINY_RCU really needs a different rcu_barrier()
than do the treercu implementations.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcupdate.c | 32 ++++++++++----------------------
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcupdate.c b/kernel/rcupdate.c
index 2480534..fd3ec49 100644
--- a/kernel/rcupdate.c
+++ b/kernel/rcupdate.c
@@ -53,12 +53,6 @@ struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map =
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_lock_map);
#endif
-enum rcu_barrier {
- RCU_BARRIER_STD,
- RCU_BARRIER_BH,
- RCU_BARRIER_SCHED,
-};
-
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_head, rcu_barrier_head) = {NULL};
static atomic_t rcu_barrier_cpu_count;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(rcu_barrier_mutex);
@@ -188,19 +182,12 @@ static void rcu_barrier_func(void *type)
{
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct rcu_head *head = &per_cpu(rcu_barrier_head, cpu);
+ void (*call_rcu_func)(struct rcu_head *head,
+ void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head));
atomic_inc(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count);
- switch ((enum rcu_barrier)type) {
- case RCU_BARRIER_STD:
- call_rcu(head, rcu_barrier_callback);
- break;
- case RCU_BARRIER_BH:
- call_rcu_bh(head, rcu_barrier_callback);
- break;
- case RCU_BARRIER_SCHED:
- call_rcu_sched(head, rcu_barrier_callback);
- break;
- }
+ call_rcu_func = type;
+ call_rcu_func(head, rcu_barrier_callback);
}
static inline void wait_migrated_callbacks(void)
@@ -213,7 +200,8 @@ static inline void wait_migrated_callbacks(void)
* Orchestrate the specified type of RCU barrier, waiting for all
* RCU callbacks of the specified type to complete.
*/
-static void _rcu_barrier(enum rcu_barrier type)
+static void _rcu_barrier(void (*call_rcu_func)(struct rcu_head *head,
+ void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head)))
{
BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
/* Take cpucontrol mutex to protect against CPU hotplug */
@@ -229,7 +217,7 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(enum rcu_barrier type)
* early.
*/
atomic_set(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count, 1);
- on_each_cpu(rcu_barrier_func, (void *)type, 1);
+ on_each_cpu(rcu_barrier_func, (void *)call_rcu_func, 1);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count))
complete(&rcu_barrier_completion);
wait_for_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
@@ -242,7 +230,7 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(enum rcu_barrier type)
*/
void rcu_barrier(void)
{
- _rcu_barrier(RCU_BARRIER_STD);
+ _rcu_barrier(call_rcu);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier);
@@ -251,7 +239,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier);
*/
void rcu_barrier_bh(void)
{
- _rcu_barrier(RCU_BARRIER_BH);
+ _rcu_barrier(call_rcu_bh);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_bh);
@@ -260,7 +248,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_bh);
*/
void rcu_barrier_sched(void)
{
- _rcu_barrier(RCU_BARRIER_SCHED);
+ _rcu_barrier(call_rcu_sched);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_sched);
--
1.5.2.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists