[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090930143953.GA2014@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:09:53 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To: Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 0/8] CFS Hard limits - v2
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 07:55:37PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 05:36:29PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> > Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Here is the v2 post of hard limits feature for CFS group scheduler. This
> > > RFC post mainly adds runtime borrowing feature and has a new locking scheme
> > > to protect CFS runtime related fields.
> > >
> > > It would be nice to have some comments on this set!
> >
> > I have a question I'd like to ask before diving into the code.
> > Consider I'm a user, that has a 4CPUs box 2GHz each and I'd like
> > to create a container with 2CPUs 1GHz each. Can I achieve this
> > after your patches?
>
> I am not sure if I understand the GHz specification you mention here.
> Are you saying that you want run a container with 2 CPUS with each of
> them running at half their (frequency)capacity ?
>
> This hard limits scheme is about time based rate limiting where you can
> specify a runtime(=hard limit) and a period for the container and the
> container will not be allowed to consume more than the specified CPU time
> within a given period.
IMO Pavel's requirement can be met with a hard limit of 25%
2 CPU of 1GHz = (1/2 x 4) (1/2 x 2) GHz CPUs
= 1/4 x 4 2GHz CPU
= 25% of (4 2GHz CPU)
IOW by hard-limiting a container thread to run just 0.5sec every sec on a 2GHz
cpu, it is effectively making progress at the rate of 1GHz?
- vatsa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists