| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4AC378C9.5050507@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:27:05 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc1
Arjan van de Ven a écrit :
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>> can't we use alternatives() for this, to patch cmpxchg64 in ?
>>> I mean.. it'll be commonly supported nowadays.. the fallback to it
>>> not being supported could be a bit slower by now...
>> Yes, we could. It would limit us to some fixed address format,
>> probably
>>
>> cmpxchg8b (%esi)
>>
>> or something. Use something like this as a starting point, perhaps?
>>
>> NOTE! Totally untested! And you'd actually need to implement the
>> "cmpxchg8b_emu" function that takes it's arguments in %eax:%edx,
>> %ebx:%ecx and %esi and doesn't trash any other registers..
>
> so I debugged this guy (had a few bugs ;-)
>
> patch, including a new cmpxchg8b_emu below:
>
> From 5a76986c5dd272ea16a9b8abb7349ff3d6791c2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:04:35 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] x86: Provide an alternative() based cmpxchg64()
>
> Based on Linus' patch, this patch provides cmpxchg64() using
> the alternative() infrastructure.
>
> Note: the fallback is NOT smp safe, just like the current fallback
> is not SMP safe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg_32.h | 29 ++++++++++--------
> arch/x86/kernel/i386_ksyms_32.c | 3 ++
> arch/x86/lib/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/x86/lib/cmpxchg8b_emu.S | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/lib/cmpxchg8b_emu.S
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg_32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg_32.h
> index 82ceb78..3b21afa 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg_32.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg_32.h
> @@ -312,19 +312,22 @@ static inline unsigned long cmpxchg_386(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old,
>
> extern unsigned long long cmpxchg_486_u64(volatile void *, u64, u64);
>
> -#define cmpxchg64(ptr, o, n) \
> -({ \
> - __typeof__(*(ptr)) __ret; \
> - if (likely(boot_cpu_data.x86 > 4)) \
> - __ret = (__typeof__(*(ptr)))__cmpxchg64((ptr), \
> - (unsigned long long)(o), \
> - (unsigned long long)(n)); \
> - else \
> - __ret = (__typeof__(*(ptr)))cmpxchg_486_u64((ptr), \
> - (unsigned long long)(o), \
> - (unsigned long long)(n)); \
> - __ret; \
> -})
> +#define cmpxchg64(ptr, o, n) \
> +({ \
> + __typeof__(*(ptr)) __ret; \
> + __typeof__(*(ptr)) __old = (o); \
> + __typeof__(*(ptr)) __new = (n); \
> + alternative_io("call cmpxchg8b_emu", \
> + "lock; cmpxchg8b (%%esi)" , \
> + X86_FEATURE_CX8, \
> + "=A" (__ret), \
> + "S" ((ptr)), "0" (__old), \
> + "b" ((unsigned int)__new), \
> + "c" ((unsigned int)(__new>>32))); \
> + __ret; })
> +
> +
> +
> #define cmpxchg64_local(ptr, o, n) \
> ({ \
> __typeof__(*(ptr)) __ret; \
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/i386_ksyms_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/i386_ksyms_32.c
> index 43cec6b..f17930e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/i386_ksyms_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/i386_ksyms_32.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(mcount);
> #endif
>
> +extern void cmpxchg8b_emu(void); /* dummy proto */
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cmpxchg8b_emu);
> +
> /* Networking helper routines. */
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(csum_partial_copy_generic);
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/Makefile b/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
> index 9e60920..3e549b8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_X86_32),y)
> obj-y += atomic64_32.o
> lib-y += checksum_32.o
> lib-y += strstr_32.o
> - lib-y += semaphore_32.o string_32.o
> + lib-y += semaphore_32.o string_32.o cmpxchg8b_emu.o
>
> lib-$(CONFIG_X86_USE_3DNOW) += mmx_32.o
> else
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/cmpxchg8b_emu.S b/arch/x86/lib/cmpxchg8b_emu.S
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b8af4c7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/cmpxchg8b_emu.S
> @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
> +/*
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> + * as published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2
> + * of the License.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/linkage.h>
> +#include <asm/alternative-asm.h>
> +#include <asm/frame.h>
> +#include <asm/dwarf2.h>
> +
> +
> +.text
> +
> +/*
> + * Inputs:
> + * %esi : memory location to compare
> + * %eax : low 32 bits of old value
> + * %edx : high 32 bits of old value
> + * %ebx : low 32 bits of new value
> + * %ecx : high 32 bits of new value
> + */
> +ENTRY(cmpxchg8b_emu)
> + CFI_STARTPROC
> +
> + push %edi
> + push %ebx
> + push %ecx
> + /* disable interrupts */
> + pushf
> + pop %edi
Why do you pop flags in edi, to later re-push them ?
> + cli
> +
> + cmpl %edx, 4(%esi)
> + jne 1f
> + cmpl %eax, (%esi)
> + jne 1f
> +
So we dont have irq fro this cpu, ok.
And other cpus allowed, and xchg implies lock prefix, ok.
> + xchg (%esi), %ebx
> + xchg 4(%esi), %ecx
How this sequence is guaranteed to be atomic with other cpus ?
If it is a !SMP implementation, then you could replace xchg by mov instructions.
mov %ebx,(%esi)
mov %ecx,4(%esi)
> + mov %ebx, %eax
> + mov %ecx, %edx
and avoid these of course
> +
> +2:
> + /* restore interrupts */
> + push %edi
> + popf
> +
> + pop %ecx
> + pop %ebx
> + pop %edi
> + ret
> +1:
> + mov (%esi), %eax
> + mov 4(%esi), %edx
> + jmp 2b
> + CFI_ENDPROC
> +ENDPROC(cmpxchg8b_emu)
> +
So I suggest :
ENTRY(cmpxchg8b_emu)
CFI_STARTPROC
/* disable interrupts */
pushf
cli
cmpl %eax,(%esi)
jne 1f
cmpl %edx,4(%esi)
jne 2f
mov %ebx,(%esi)
mov %ecx,4(%esi)
/* restore interrupts */
popf
ret
1:
mov (%esi), %eax
2:
mov 4(%esi), %edx
popf
ret
CFI_ENDPROC
ENDPROC(cmpxchg8b_emu)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists