linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/80] Kernel based checkpoint/restart [v18]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:28:36 -0700
From:	Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>
Cc:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, xemul@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/80] Kernel based checkpoint/restart [v18]

DL> Yep, I agree. But you didn't answer the question, what are the
DL> network resources you plan to checkpoint / restart ?  eg. you let
DL> the container to setup your network, will you restore netdev
DL> statistics ? the mac address ? ipv4 ? ipv6 ?

Yes, Yes, Yes, and Yes.  I'm making the assumption that the common
case will be with a veth device in the container and that all of the
aforementioned attributes should be copied over.  In the future case
where we could potentially have a real device in the container, it
probably doesn't make sense to copy the mac address.

DL> Is it possible to do a detailed list of network resources you plan
DL> to CR with the different items you will address from userspace and
DL> kernel space ?

I'm sure it's possible, but no, I haven't planned out everything for
the next year.  If you have strong feelings about what should be done
in user and kernel space, feel free to share :)

DL> Argh ! I was hoping there was something else than the source code

The header file makes it pretty clear what is going on, but maybe the
Documentation/checkpoint/readme.txt will help.  Putting all the
details in such a documentation file would be rather silly at the
moment, given that new things are being added at a rapid rate and it
would duplicate the only description that matters, which is the
header file.

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: danms@...ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/