lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51f3faa70909301638s4eff14edg46420e2e8877fd15@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:38:21 -0600
From:	Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
To:	Thomas Backlund <tmb@...driva.org>
Cc:	Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@...il.com>, lm-sensors@...sensors.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	astarikovskiy@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] asus_atk0110: add support for Asus P7P55D

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Thomas Backlund <tmb@...driva.org> wrote:
> Robert Hancock skrev:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@...il.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Robert,
>>>>>> I have a new patch for you :)
>>>>>> It contains the previous changes to handle the bigger ASBF buffer plus
>>>>>> a new
>>>>>> method to enable the EC as suggested by Asus. Be sure to compile with
>>>>>> HWMON_DEBUG_CHIP enabled.
>>>>>
>>>>> Excellent.. seems to work now and give actually updating sensor
>>>>> readings :-)
>>>>
>>>> Have seen a couple of these though, looks like about once an hour:
>>>>
>>>> ACPI Exception: AE_TIME, Returned by Handler for [EmbeddedControl]
>>>> (20090903/evregion-424)
>>>> ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed
>>>> [\_SB_.PCI0.SBRG.ASOC.GIT6] (Node ffff88013ba778c0), AE_TIME
>>>> ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed
>>>> [\_SB_.PCI0.SBRG.ASOC.GITM] (Node ffff88013ba6ea40), AE_TIME
>>>> ATK0110 ATK0110:00: atk_read_value_new: ACPI exception: AE_TIME
>>>>
>>>> Maybe sometimes the embedded controller takes longer than the timeout
>>>> to process, or something?
>>>
>>> Is there a message like "input buffer is not empty" before that?
>>
>> Nope, that's all I'm getting each time it happens. Suggestions/debug
>> patches welcome..
>>
>
> Try this one:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125421276407283&w=2

With that patch it's lasted almost a day with no timeouts, previously
I was getting about one every hour. Has that patch been submitted?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ