linux-kernel - [PATCH] connector: Fix regression introduced by sid connector

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200909300843.11208.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:43:11 +0200
From:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Scott James Remnant <scott@...ntu.com>,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] connector: Fix regression introduced by sid connector

Hi Andrew,

since commit 02b51df1b07b4e9ca823c89284e704cadb323cd1 (proc connector: add event 
for process becoming session leader) we have the following warning:
Badness at kernel/softirq.c:143
[...]
Krnl PSW : 0404c00180000000 00000000001481d4 (local_bh_enable+0xb0/0xe0)
[...]
Call Trace:
([<000000013fe04100>] 0x13fe04100)
 [<000000000048a946>] sk_filter+0x9a/0xd0
 [<000000000049d938>] netlink_broadcast+0x2c0/0x53c
 [<00000000003ba9ae>] cn_netlink_send+0x272/0x2b0
 [<00000000003baef0>] proc_sid_connector+0xc4/0xd4
 [<0000000000142604>] __set_special_pids+0x58/0x90
 [<0000000000159938>] sys_setsid+0xb4/0xd8
 [<00000000001187fe>] sysc_noemu+0x10/0x16
 [<00000041616cb266>] 0x41616cb266

The warning is
--->    WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq() || irqs_disabled());

The network code must not be called with disabled interrupts but
sys_setsid holds the tasklist_lock with spinlock_irq while calling
the connector. 
After a discussion we agreed that we can move proc_sid_connector
from __set_special_pids to sys_setsid.
We also agreed that it is sufficient to change the check from
task_session(curr) != pid into err > 0, since if we don't change the
session, this means we were already the leader and return -EPERM.

One last thing:
There is also daemonize(), and some people might want to get a
notification in that case. Since daemonize() is only needed if a user
space does kernel_thread this does not look important (and there seems
to be no consensus if this connector should be called in daemonize). If
we really want this, we can add proc_sid_connector to daemonize() in an
additional patch (Scott?)

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
CCed: Scott James Remnant <scott@...ntu.com>
CCed: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
CCed: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
---
 kernel/exit.c |    4 +---
 kernel/sys.c  |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/exit.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/exit.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/exit.c
@@ -359,10 +359,8 @@ void __set_special_pids(struct pid *pid)
 {
 	struct task_struct *curr = current->group_leader;
 
-	if (task_session(curr) != pid) {
+	if (task_session(curr) != pid)
 		change_pid(curr, PIDTYPE_SID, pid);
-		proc_sid_connector(curr);
-	}
 
 	if (task_pgrp(curr) != pid)
 		change_pid(curr, PIDTYPE_PGID, pid);
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sys.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sys.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sys.c
@@ -1110,6 +1110,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(setsid)
 	err = session;
 out:
 	write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+	if (err > 0)
+		proc_sid_connector(sid);
 	return err;
 }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/