[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10133.1254402320@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:05:20 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, jeff@...zik.org, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
jens.axboe@...cle.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, arjan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/19] workqueue: update cwq alignement and make one more flag bit available
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> +enum {
> + WORK_STRUCT_PENDING = 0, /* work item is pending execution */
> +
> + /*
> + * Reserve 3bits off of cwq pointer. This is enough and
> + * provides acceptable alignment on both 32 and 64bit
> + * machines.
> + */
> + WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_BITS = 3,
> +
> + WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK = (1UL << WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_BITS) - 1,
> + WORK_STRUCT_WQ_DATA_MASK = ~WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK,
> +};
There's some great enum abuse going on here:-)
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists