[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89E2752CFA8EC044846EB849981913410173DCE285@EXCH-MBX-4.vmware.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:18:49 -0700
From: Shreyas Bhatewara <sbhatewara@...are.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
pv-drivers <pv-drivers@...are.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2.6.32-rc1] net: VMware virtual Ethernet NIC driver:
vmxnet3
Stephen,
Thanks for taking a look.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:shemminger@...tta.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 5:39 PM
> To: Shreyas Bhatewara
> Cc: linux-kernel; netdev; Stephen Hemminger; David S. Miller; Jeff
> Garzik; Anthony Liguori; Chris Wright; Greg Kroah-Hartman; Andrew
> Morton; virtualization; pv-drivers
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.32-rc1] net: VMware virtual Ethernet NIC
> driver: vmxnet3
>
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
> Shreyas Bhatewara <sbhatewara@...are.com> wrote:
>
> Note: your patch was linewrapped again
>
Fixed the alpine option. Should not happen again.
> > +
> > +
> > +static void
> > +vmxnet3_declare_features(struct vmxnet3_adapter *adapter, bool
> dma64)
> > +{
> > + struct net_device *netdev = adapter->netdev;
> > +
> > + netdev->features = NETIF_F_SG |
> > + NETIF_F_HW_CSUM |
> > + NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_TX |
> > + NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX |
> > + NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_FILTER |
> > + NETIF_F_TSO |
> > + NETIF_F_TSO6;
> > +
> > + printk(KERN_INFO "features: sg csum vlan jf tso tsoIPv6");
> > +
> > + adapter->rxcsum = true;
> > + adapter->jumbo_frame = true;
> > +
> > + if (!disable_lro) {
> > + adapter->lro = true;
> > + printk(" lro");
> > + }
>
> Why not use NETIF_F_LRO and ethtool to control LRO support?
Yes, that would be a better way to do it. I will make that change.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists