[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091001151211.GA24308@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:12:11 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, jeff@...zik.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/19] workqueue: implement concurrency managed
workqueue
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:09:18 +0900 Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > To solve the above issues, this patch implements concurrency-managed
> > workqueue.
>
> Seems reasonable.
>
> This approach would appear to rule out the option of setting a work
> thread's state (scheduling policy, scheduling priority, uid, etc) to
> anything other than some default.
>
> I guess that's unlikely to be a problem if we haven't yet had a need
> to do that, but I'd be a bit surprised to discover that nobody has
> done that sort of thing yet? Nobody has niced up their workqueue
> threads?
tuna in -rt might do that perhaps?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists