[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091001173955.524b2bc6@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:39:55 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, dhowells@...hat.com, jeff@...zik.org,
mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
arjan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/19] workqueue: update cwq alignement and make one
more flag bit available
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:05:20 +0100
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > +enum {
> > + WORK_STRUCT_PENDING = 0, /* work item is pending execution */
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Reserve 3bits off of cwq pointer. This is enough and
> > + * provides acceptable alignment on both 32 and 64bit
> > + * machines.
> > + */
> > + WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_BITS = 3,
> > +
> > + WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK = (1UL << WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_BITS) - 1,
> > + WORK_STRUCT_WQ_DATA_MASK = ~WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK,
> > +};
>
> There's some great enum abuse going on here:-)
Its actually a very sensible use of enum - enum constants don't contain
the deathtraps that CPP constants do.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists