[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091001045945.GA30932@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 06:59:45 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
g.liakhovetski@....de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Updates for spi-imx
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 04:52:41PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:42:11 +0200
> Uwe Kleine-K__nig <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > as a followup to this mail I'll send some updates for the spi-imx
> > driver for review.
>
> Several of these patches were unchangelogged but afaict they all fix
> bugs and hence should be in 2.6.32, yes?
I'm not sure about "strip down chipselect function to only drive the
chipselect", that's why I marked it RFC. I see the driver working with
it and using less register writes, but if someone would check it and
consider it OK, I'd feel better.
"spi-imx: no need to assert bits_per_word being initialized" isn't a
real bugfix, it just removes an if(...) that is never hit.
The other (non-naughty) patches are bugfixes, yes.
> Renaming the entire source file after -rc1 was probably a bit naughty,
> but we'll survive.
I didn't target for 2.6.32, I just wanted to get rid of the patches.
The earlier they get in the better for me.
To be honest I expected to get back some patches because of the missing
changelog. I just wanted to get them out before going to bed.
Best regards and thanks for picking my patches up
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists