lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-0e29f18291cb35b84d0a42c1a79886571b6e5409@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Thu, 1 Oct 2009 07:46:00 GMT
From:	"tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Replace the rcu_barrier enum with pointer to call_rcu*() function

Commit-ID:  0e29f18291cb35b84d0a42c1a79886571b6e5409
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/0e29f18291cb35b84d0a42c1a79886571b6e5409
Author:     Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:50:21 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:18:31 +0200

rcu: Replace the rcu_barrier enum with pointer to call_rcu*() function

The rcu_barrier enum causes several problems:

  (1) you have to define the enum somewhere, and there is no
      convenient place,

  (2) the difference between TREE_RCU and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU causes
      problems when you need to map from rcu_barrier enum to struct
      rcu_state,

  (3) the switch statement are large, and

  (4) TINY_RCU really needs a different rcu_barrier() than do the
      treercu implementations.

So replace it with a functionally equivalent but cleaner function
pointer abstraction.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: laijs@...fujitsu.com
Cc: dipankar@...ibm.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: josh@...htriplett.org
Cc: dvhltc@...ibm.com
Cc: niv@...ibm.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com
LKML-Reference: <12541998232366-git-send-email->
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>


---
 kernel/rcupdate.c |   32 ++++++++++----------------------
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcupdate.c b/kernel/rcupdate.c
index 2480534..fd3ec49 100644
--- a/kernel/rcupdate.c
+++ b/kernel/rcupdate.c
@@ -53,12 +53,6 @@ struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map =
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_lock_map);
 #endif
 
-enum rcu_barrier {
-	RCU_BARRIER_STD,
-	RCU_BARRIER_BH,
-	RCU_BARRIER_SCHED,
-};
-
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_head, rcu_barrier_head) = {NULL};
 static atomic_t rcu_barrier_cpu_count;
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(rcu_barrier_mutex);
@@ -188,19 +182,12 @@ static void rcu_barrier_func(void *type)
 {
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	struct rcu_head *head = &per_cpu(rcu_barrier_head, cpu);
+	void (*call_rcu_func)(struct rcu_head *head,
+			      void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head));
 
 	atomic_inc(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count);
-	switch ((enum rcu_barrier)type) {
-	case RCU_BARRIER_STD:
-		call_rcu(head, rcu_barrier_callback);
-		break;
-	case RCU_BARRIER_BH:
-		call_rcu_bh(head, rcu_barrier_callback);
-		break;
-	case RCU_BARRIER_SCHED:
-		call_rcu_sched(head, rcu_barrier_callback);
-		break;
-	}
+	call_rcu_func = type;
+	call_rcu_func(head, rcu_barrier_callback);
 }
 
 static inline void wait_migrated_callbacks(void)
@@ -213,7 +200,8 @@ static inline void wait_migrated_callbacks(void)
  * Orchestrate the specified type of RCU barrier, waiting for all
  * RCU callbacks of the specified type to complete.
  */
-static void _rcu_barrier(enum rcu_barrier type)
+static void _rcu_barrier(void (*call_rcu_func)(struct rcu_head *head,
+					       void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head)))
 {
 	BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
 	/* Take cpucontrol mutex to protect against CPU hotplug */
@@ -229,7 +217,7 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(enum rcu_barrier type)
 	 * early.
 	 */
 	atomic_set(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count, 1);
-	on_each_cpu(rcu_barrier_func, (void *)type, 1);
+	on_each_cpu(rcu_barrier_func, (void *)call_rcu_func, 1);
 	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count))
 		complete(&rcu_barrier_completion);
 	wait_for_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
@@ -242,7 +230,7 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(enum rcu_barrier type)
  */
 void rcu_barrier(void)
 {
-	_rcu_barrier(RCU_BARRIER_STD);
+	_rcu_barrier(call_rcu);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier);
 
@@ -251,7 +239,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier);
  */
 void rcu_barrier_bh(void)
 {
-	_rcu_barrier(RCU_BARRIER_BH);
+	_rcu_barrier(call_rcu_bh);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_bh);
 
@@ -260,7 +248,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_bh);
  */
 void rcu_barrier_sched(void)
 {
-	_rcu_barrier(RCU_BARRIER_SCHED);
+	_rcu_barrier(call_rcu_sched);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_sched);
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ