[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0910011817120.6996@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, tglx@...utronix.de,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: T400 suspend/resume regression -- bisected to a mystery merge
commit
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
> commit 8c3ee48dabee782d470cc4c7048ea64bb8b7d1cb
> Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> Date: Thu Oct 1 20:39:03 2009 -0400
>
> Revert "timekeeping: Update clocksource with stop_machine"
>
> This reverts commit 75c5158f70c065b9704b924503d96e8297838f79.
Hmm. Looks good. But you didn't cc most of the people actually involved
with that commit (Martin who is the author, and John who acked it).
I think the revert is the right thing to do, especially as that
'clocksource_mutex' looks totally bogus. Either the thing is protected by
'stop_machine' or it's not. In neither case does it seem to make any sense
to replace a spinlock with a mutex.
And resuming anything with a big mutex is crazy anyway.
That said, I do wonder if this is already fixed. See commit
89133f93508137231251543d1732da638e6022e1:
clocksource: Resume clocksource without taking the clocksource mutex
which already undid the part that probably mattered for you. That said, I
still do think that that mutex is dubious, so maybe we should undo it all.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists