[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091002092954.GA20779@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:29:54 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: cl@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
davem@...emloft.net, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V3 00/19] Introduce per cpu atomic operations and
avoid per cpu address arithmetic
* cl@...ux-foundation.org <cl@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> V2->V3:
> - Available via git tree against latest upstream from
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/christoph/percpu.git linus
> - Rework SLUB per cpu operations. Get rid of dynamic DMA slab creation
> for CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> - Create fallback framework so that 64 bit ops on 32 bit platforms
> can fallback to the use of preempt or interrupt disable. 64 bit
> platforms can use 64 bit atomic per cpu ops.
I'm going to ask you (again...) to post future versions of this patchset
to lkml.
linux-mm is a limited forum and a lot of people who might be interested
in percpu matters simply wont know about your patch-set. per-cpu is not
just a VM matter, obviously - it affects architectures, core kernel
code, etc. etc.
I happened to see your patch-set and have a couple of comments about it
but i will wait with discussing the issues until you submit these
patches properly.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists