2.6.31-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. ------------------ From: Weirich, Bernhard [I'm going to fix upstream differently, by having all CPU types actually support _PAGE_SPECIAL, but I prefer the simple and obvious fix for -stable. -- Ben] The test that decides whether to define __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL on powerpc is bogus and will end up always defining it, even when _PAGE_SPECIAL is not supported (in which case it's 0) such as on 8xx or 40x processors. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Weirich Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-common.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-common.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-common.h @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ extern unsigned long bad_call_to_PMD_PAG #define HAVE_PAGE_AGP /* Advertise support for _PAGE_SPECIAL */ -#ifdef _PAGE_SPECIAL +#if _PAGE_SPECIAL != 0 #define __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL #endif -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/