[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091002135859.GA9383@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 06:58:59 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] SECURITY ISSUE with connector
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 02:40:03PM +0200, Philipp Reisner wrote:
> Affected: All code that uses connector, in kernel and out of mainline
>
> The connector, as it is today, does not allow the in kernel receiving
> parts to do any checks on privileges of a message's sender.
So, assume I know nothing about the connector architecture, what does
this mean in a security context?
> I know, there are not many out there that like connector, but as
> long as it is in the kernel, we have to fix the security issues it has!
And what specifically are the security issues?
> Please either drop connector, or someone who feels a bit responsible
> and has our beloved dictator's blessing, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE take
> this into your tree, and send the pull request to Linus.
>
> Patches 1 to 4 are already Acked-by Evgeny, the connector's maintainer.
> Patches 5 to 7 are the obvious fixes to the connector user's code.
Obvious in what way?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists