[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AC61D4E.4040000@microgate.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:33:34 -0600
From: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@...rogate.com>
To: lenrek@...com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/char/pcmcia/synclink_cs.c: BKL pushdown?
lenrek@...com wrote:
> How about the BKL calls in synclinkmp.c, synclink.c, and synclink_gt.c?
> Can they be safely eliminated?
I looked those over and yes, the BKL can be removed
from those as well. All 4 synclink drivers are mostly
variations on the same code.
It looks like the lock_kernel calls were blindly pushed down
for safety during the initial transition, but all of the
functions covered either use device specific locking or
do not require locking.
--
Paul Fulghum
MicroGate Systems, Ltd.
=Customer Driven, by Design=
(800)444-1982
(512)345-7791 (Direct)
(512)343-9046 (Fax)
Central Time Zone (GMT -5h)
www.microgate.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists