[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12774.1254502217@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:50:17 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Ulrich Lukas <stellplatz-nr.13a@...enparkplatz.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
nauman@...gle.com, dpshah@...gle.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
mikew@...gle.com, fchecconi@...il.com, paolo.valente@...more.it,
ryov@...inux.co.jp, fernando@....ntt.co.jp, jmoyer@...hat.com,
dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
righi.andrea@...il.com, m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com, agk@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org,
jmarchan@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:40:20 EDT, Vivek Goyal said:
> In that case, Corrado's suggestion of refining it further and disabling idling
> for seeky process only on non-rotational media (SSD and hardware RAID), makes
> sense to me.
Umm... I got petabytes of hardware RAID across the hall that very definitely
*is* rotating. Did you mean "SSD and disk systems with big honking caches
that cover up the rotation"? Because "RAID" and "big honking caches" are
not *quite* the same thing, and I can just see that corner case coming out
to bite somebody on the ass...
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists