[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091002165316.GB3890@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:53:16 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@....com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
stable-review@...nel.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [stable] [109/136] USB: xhci: Make TRB completion code
comparison readable.
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 05:38:36PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > 2.6.31-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> >
> > ------------------
> > From: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > commit 66d1eebce5cca916e0b08d961690bb01c64751ef upstream.
> >
> > Use trb_comp_code instead of getting the completion code from the transfer
> > event every time.
>
> Are all these xhci patches really candidates for the stable tree? XHCI
> support is marked as EXPERIMENTAL, the xhci standard is still at the
> draft stage, and I don't believe there are any xhci products available
> on the market yet.
Did you read the 000/136 message where I explained why I was accepting
all of these xhci patches into the -stable tree?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists