linux-kernel - Re: [this_cpu_xx V4 00/20] Introduce per cpu atomic operations and avoid per cpu address arithmetic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0910021310150.26189@gentwo.org>
Date:	Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:10:35 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V4 00/20] Introduce per cpu atomic operations and
 avoid per cpu address arithmetic

On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Tejun Heo wrote:

> cl@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> > V3->V4:
> > - Fix various macro definitions.
> > - Provider experimental percpu based fastpath that does not disable
> >   interrupts for SLUB.
>
> The series looks very good to me.  percpu#for-next now has ia64 bits
> included and the legacy allocator is gone there so it can carry this
> series.  Sans the last one, they seem they can be stable and
> incremental from now on, right?  Shall I include this series into the
> percpu tree?

You can include all but the last patch that is experimental.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/