[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091002213630.42c73909@neptune.home>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 21:36:30 +0200
From: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13942] Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
On Thu, 01 October 2009 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still
> should be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942
> Subject : Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
> Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>
> Date : 2009-08-04 10:12 (59 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124938117104811&w=4
This should have been fixed with commits:
18d8217bc441630c3c5ec7416c5a65c69e8a0979
aoe: end barrier bios with EOPNOTSUPP
This addresses the trace on unmounting XFS
7135a71b19be1faf48b7148d77844d03bc0717d6
aoe: allocate unused request_queue for sysfs
This addresses the NULL kobject part
I think the second one made it into 2.6.31 but first one didn't,
please double-check! I've not seen them on stable though (which might
be worth especially for the first one)
Bruno
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists