linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #13942] Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200910022324.37790.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Fri, 2 Oct 2009 23:24:37 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13942] Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object

On Friday 02 October 2009, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> On Thu, 01 October 2009 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.  Please verify if it still
> > should be listed and let me know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942
> > Subject	: Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
> > Submitter	: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>
> > Date		: 2009-08-04 10:12 (59 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124938117104811&w=4
> 
> This should have been fixed with commits:
> 
>   18d8217bc441630c3c5ec7416c5a65c69e8a0979
>   aoe: end barrier bios with EOPNOTSUPP
> 
>   This addresses the trace on unmounting XFS
> 
> 
>   7135a71b19be1faf48b7148d77844d03bc0717d6
>   aoe: allocate unused request_queue for sysfs
> 
>   This addresses the NULL kobject part
> 
> 
> I think the second one made it into 2.6.31 but first one didn't,

Yes, it idid.

> please double-check! I've not seen them on stable though (which might
> be worth especially for the first one)

Thanks, closed.

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/