linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #14261] e1000e jumbo frames no longer work: 'Unsupported MTU setting'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9929d2390910021513t51827031k16a5bfc538640cbf@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 2 Oct 2009 15:13:07 -0700
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
	e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bug #14261] e1000e jumbo frames no longer work: 'Unsupported MTU 
	setting'

On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 14:31, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> On Friday 02 October 2009, Nix wrote:
>> On 1 Oct 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki stated:
>>
>> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.  Please verify if it still should
>> > be listed and let me know (either way).
>>
>> The patch fixes it.
>>
>> > Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14261
>> > Subject             : e1000e jumbo frames no longer work: 'Unsupported MTU setting'
>> > Submitter   : Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
>> > Date                : 2009-09-26 11:16 (6 days old)
>> > References  : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125396433321342&w=4
>> > Handled-By  : Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
>> > Patch               : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/50277/
>>
>> (Possibly a stable candidate? It's not in 2.6.31.2-to-be, perhaps the
>> only patch that isn't. ;) )
>
> Most likely because it's not in the Linus' tree yet.
>
> [e1000e maintainers, we have a regression fix to merge, please.]
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael

Sorry, I forgot to send this patch out last night.  I will send it now.

-- 
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/