[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200910032035.21884.mb@bu3sch.de>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:35:19 +0200
From: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
To: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
Cc: i4ldeveloper@...tserv.isdn4linux.de,
Carsten Paeth <calle@...le.de>,
Karsten Keil <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>,
Karsten Keil <keil@...systems.de>,
Armin Schindler <armin@...ware.de>,
isdn4linux@...tserv.isdn4linux.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] isdn/capi: fix up CAPI subsystem workaround locking a bit
On Saturday 03 October 2009 20:26:22 Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Saturday 03 October 2009 14:06:57 Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> > Move calls to handle_minor_send() and handle_minor_recv() out of
> > the sections locked by workaround_lock.
> > - handle_minor_send() may call another CAPI function via the card
> > driver, deadlocking by trying to take workaround_lock again.
> > - handle_minor_recv() calls the receive_buf method of the active
> > line discipline which may sleep.
>
> I remember that handle_minor_send() and/or handle_minor_recv() showed up
> in the crash backtraces. So if you move them out of the critical
> section, you can as well remove the lock completely.
>
here's my original mail:
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0605.0/0455.html
Note the patch in that mail does _not_ fix the issue, as it turned out later.
Then I did the workaround-lock patch, which _did_ fix it.
But in that mail you can see the original crash backtraces, which might be
useful for finding out what _really_ happened.
--
Greetings, Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists