| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4AC7279B.3050901@kernel.org> Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 19:29:47 +0900 From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> To: cl@...ux-foundation.org CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, mingo@...e.hu, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V4 12/20] Move early initialization of pagesets out of zone_wait_table_init() cl@...ux-foundation.org wrote: > Explicitly initialize the pagesets after the per cpu areas have been > initialized. This is necessary in order to be able to use per cpu > operations in later patches. > > Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org> > > --- > arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c | 1 + > arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c | 1 + > arch/sparc/kernel/smp_64.c | 1 + > arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c | 2 ++ > include/linux/mm.h | 1 + > mm/page_alloc.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > mm/percpu.c | 2 ++ Hmmm... why not call this function from start_kernel() after calling setup_per_cpu_areas() instead of modifying every implementation of setup_per_cpu_areas()? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists