[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4e5e476b0910041354o54c95626g974264976adaf53c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 22:54:44 +0200
From: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: bug in elevator/cfq regarding start_time?
Hi Jens,
I found that the start_time is not monotonic in the cfqq fifo_list.
The problem seems to be that:
* attempt_merge overrides one of the start_time:
if (time_after(req->start_time, next->start_time))
req->start_time = next->start_time;
* then it calls elv_merge_requests, that in turn invokes cfq's
elevator_merge_req_fn, i.e. cfq_merged_requests
* cfq_merged_requests checks start_times to decide whether requests
need to be repositioned
if (!list_empty(&rq->queuelist) && !list_empty(&next->queuelist) &&
time_before(next->start_time, rq->start_time))
list_move(&rq->queuelist, &next->queuelist);
Other I/O schedulers are not affected, since none of them uses
start_time explicitly, but they have a copy in one of the private
fields.
Corrado
--
__________________________________________________________________________
dott. Corrado Zoccolo mailto:czoccolo@...il.com
PhD - Department of Computer Science - University of Pisa, Italy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists