[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091004145057.3de230a9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 14:50:57 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] connector: Keep the skb in cn_callback_data
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:48:08 +0200 Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
> Acked-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>
Please don't send unchangelogged patches.
> diff --git a/include/linux/connector.h b/include/linux/connector.h
> index 47ebf41..05a7a14 100644
> --- a/include/linux/connector.h
> +++ b/include/linux/connector.h
> @@ -134,8 +134,8 @@ struct cn_callback_id {
> struct cn_callback_data {
> void (*destruct_data) (void *);
> void *ddata;
> -
> - void *callback_priv;
> +
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> void (*callback) (struct cn_msg *);
>
> void *free;
This one replaces the void* private pointer with the skb but you didn't
explain to us why this was done.
Also, the patch does two things. It _adds_ the skb pointer and it also
_removes_ the opaque void* private-data pointer for the callbacks.
What are the implications of removing callback_priv? Why was this done?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists