[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091003192524.2ca2bd9e@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 19:25:24 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Matteo Croce <technoboy85@...il.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: i686 quirk for AMD Geode
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 00:04:03 +0200
Matteo Croce <technoboy85@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > the number that is exposed in /proc/cpuinfo does not control
> > if cmov is used... so the patch and the benchmark are totally
> > unrelated.
> >
>
> yes cmov and i686 are unrelated but some distros (Debian & co.)
> compiles libraries for two archs:
> i486 and i686-cmov so only i686 machines does benefit from cmov.
> This is why I cared about having an i686 aware userspace but it seems
> that for a missing instruction I can't do that
I'm surprised that "i686" in debian depends on the family flag
in /proc/cpuinfo.. but hey.. weirder things have been done.
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists