[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091004145755.90312e7e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 14:57:55 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] connector: Removed the destruct_data callback since it
is always kfree_skb()
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:48:11 +0200 Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
> Acked-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>
Please don't send unchangelogged patches.
> index 163c3e3..210338e 100644
> --- a/drivers/connector/cn_queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/connector/cn_queue.c
> @@ -83,8 +83,8 @@ void cn_queue_wrapper(struct work_struct *work)
>
> d->callback(msg, nsp);
>
> - d->destruct_data(d->ddata);
> - d->ddata = NULL;
> + kfree_skb(d->skb);
> + d->skb = NULL;
>
> kfree(d->free);
> }
So.. why is this a good thing to do? The patchset removes the option
of ever putting anything other than an skb* into the callback data, it
does this without any dicussion or justification and it does it under
the guise of "allowing permission checking in the receiver callbacks".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists