[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091004223705.GB5030@dis.manty.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 00:37:05 +0200
From: Santiago Garcia Mantinan <manty@...ty.net>
To: Santiago Garcia Mantinan <manty@...ty.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at drivers/ide/ide-disk.c:187 (2.6.31)
> Applied it to 2.6.31.1, I'll wait and see what the weekend tells us.
up 2 days, 8:27 and still nothing, maybe I shouldn't have applied it to .1
as some of the fixes there could be masking the problem and I should be
testing it on 2.6.31 :-?
What do you think about, that, should I compile a plain 2.6.31? or should I
give 2.6.31.1 some more time?
On the other hand when I tried to compile a kernel for a non IDE machine out
of the same 2.6.31.1 patched sources I found this error:
ERROR: "ide_kill_rq" [drivers/ide/ide-gd_mod.ko] undefined!
make[2]: *** [__modpost] Erro 1
make[1]: *** [modules] Erro 2
make[1]: SaĆndo do directorio `/usr/src/linux-2.6.31'
After reverting the patch it compiled ok, of course, I was wondering if this
only affects the modules build and for the test we are having I have IDE in
the kernel, so no problem with that, or if that can affect the IDE kernel as
well and it may break because of the patch or something.
Regards...
--
Manty/BestiaTester -> http://manty.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists